欢迎安装高清版[一起看]电影APP
Oscar’s BEST PICTURE obtainer, Canadian filmmaker Norman Jewison’s IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT pluckily wrestles with the racial tension through a black-skinned homicidal detective Virgil Tibbs (Poiter), hailed from Philadelphia but stands up like a sore thumb in a southern town Sparta in Mississippi, where a wealthy industrialist is murdered.
Virgil is wantonly brought to the local police station as the chief suspect in the first place, by a vacuously cocksure officer Sam Wood (Oates, conspicuously poses with an air of casual small-mindedness), a decision precociously conducted simply owing to Virgil’s skin color, albeit he is garbed in suit-and-tie, Sam instinctively deems this black guy is the murderer without even questioning him, assumes that he awaits fleeing in the train station at 3 a.m. Virgil remains cooperative under duress, only to manifest his ace in the hole with his police badge, in front of the sheriff Gillespie (Steiger), the first slap in the face.
While it seems arbitrary that Virgil's superior would patly ask him to assist the investigation by phone, but the sticking point soon boils down to Virgil's decision of leaving or staying (due to the rampant hostility from local peckerwoods), a seesaw game well played between Virgil and Gillespie, each turnabout marks a shifting progress in their respective cognition towards each other, in tandem with the ongoing police procedural. But admittedly the unfolding crime-solving routine doesn’t crop up completely creditable as the film’s renown attests. Virgil is way head and shoulders above his peers born with lighter-complexion, in certifying facts and sifting out clues (and might even be endowed with some psychic ability, otherwise how could he be so sure about Sam’s veered routine? A snag the film never cares to elucidate). The only foible is his preconceived bias, which is accountably shaped up by hardened racism he has to come in for on a daily base, and near the climax, he admits it frankly and timely swerves to the right track in teasing out the hidden perpetrator.
Tellingly, what makes the film"culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant”, cited as its induction in the United States National Film Registry in 2002, is the palpably construction of the foe-to-friend transition between these two men, but not in the modality of indoctrination or spoon-feeding, today’s audience might find it beggar-belief to some egregiously blinkered presentation of racism (which could very much be the case as we twig half a century later, the canker has never ceased to incubate), however, not for one minute, we have to stretch our suspended disbelief in view of the two men’s mutual conflict-and-reconciliation, a sensibly crafted understanding-vanquishing-prejudice which can be related to every spectator, it is the very basic technique in storytelling: be relatable without resorting to simple preaching, but to round it out in all its integrity and empathy, it is another matter, in this sense, the film merits all the accolades it garners.
Rod Steiger won Oscar’s BEST ACTOR trophy for his bellowing imposition and everyday toiling amplified in high voltage, but in hindsight, it is hard not to attribute his triumph (at least to a degree) to the inexorable gesture of urgent political correctness. Sidney Poitier, by contrast, takes on a subtler but no less dramatic seething-and-smouldering performance to the fore in his trailblazing embodiment for his own race, a crusade he pulls his back into with unalloyed dignity and honesty. Lee Grant, in a small but pivotal role as the newly widowed rich wife from north, choreographs a most revealing pas-de-deux with Poitier in their first scene together, gives a chilling vibe of the congenital racism even from those who are ostensibly liberal-minded, the poison is like old habits, roundly die hard.
An opportune tirade spiked with oomph (tantalizing nudity is included), oompah (courtesy to Quincy Jones’ throbbing score and Ray Charles’ theme song) and moxie (robustly edited byHal Ashby who was received his first-and-only Oscar statuette, which might facilitate his transition to the director chair), like Stanley Kramer’s INHERIT THE WIND (1960), IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT needs to be mandatorily watched by every single human being if we were living in a perfect world, simply because there is cardinal verity in its story that no other belief can twist or garble.
referential points: Jewison’s FIDDLER ON THE ROOF (1971, 6.4/10), MOONSTRUCK (1987, 7.6/10);Stanley Kramer’s INHERIT THE WIND (1960, 7.7/10)
Philip Colbert, a wealthy man from Chicago who was planning to build a factory in the rural town of Sparta, Mississippi, is found murdered. Police Chief Bill Gillespie (Rod Steiger) comes under pressure to quickly find Colbert's killer. African-American northerner Virgil Tibbs (Sidney Poitier), passing through, is picked up at the train station by a police officer (Rod Steiger) who finds Tibbs with a substantial amount of cash in his wallet. Officer Gillespie, heavily prejudiced against blacks, jumps to the conclusion that he has his culprit, but is embarrassed to learn that Tibbs is a respected Philadelphia homicide detective who had been visiting his mother. After the bigoted treatment he received, Tibbs wants nothing more than to leave Sparta as quickly as possible, but his captain recommends he stay and help the investigation. The victim's widow, already frustrated by the ineptitude of the local police, is impressed by Tibbs' expert ability when he clears another wrongly-accused suspect Gillespie has arrested on flimsy evidence. She threatens to stop construction on the much-needed factory unless Tibbs leads the investigation. Unwilling to accept help but under orders from the town's mayor, Gillespie talks Tibbs into lending his services. Despite the rocky start to their relationship, the two police come to respect each other as they are compelled to work together to solve the crime. Tibbs initially suspects wealthy plantation owner Eric Endicott, who opposed the new factory. When he attempts to interrogate Endicott about Colbert, Endicott slaps him in the face. Tibbs slaps him back, which leads to Endicott sending a gang of redneck hooligans after Tibbs. Gillespie rescues Tibbs from the fight and orders him to leave town for his own safety. Tibbs refuses to leave until he has solved the case. Tibbs asks Sam Wood, the officer who discovered the body, to retrace his steps the night of the murder. He and Gillespie accompany Sam on his patrol route, stopping at a diner where the counterman, Ralph Henshaw, refuses to serve Tibbs because he is black. When Tibbs notices that Sam has deliberately changed his route, Gillespie begins to suspect Sam of the crime. When he discovers that Sam made a sizable deposit into his bank account the day after the murder (which Sam claims was gambling winnings) and Lloyd Purdy, a local, files charges against Sam for getting Purdy's 16-year-old sister, Delores, pregnant, Gillespie arrests Sam for the murder over Tibbs' protests. Purdy is insulted that Tibbs, a black man, was present for his sister's interrogation about her sexual encounter with Sam, and he gathers a lynch mob to get his revenge on Tibbs. Tibbs is able to clear Sam by finding the original murder scene and pointing out that Sam would not have been able to drive two cars at the same time to dump the body and the victim's car while continuing on his patrol. Acting on a hunch, Tibbs tracks down the local back-room abortionist, who reveals that someone paid for Delores Purdy to have an abortion. When Delores arrives, Tibbs pursues her outside, where he is confronted by the murderer: the diner counterman Ralph Henshaw. Purdy's mob tracks down Tibbs at this moment, and he is being held at gunpoint when he proves to Purdy that it was Ralph, not Sam, who got Delores pregnant. Purdy attacks Ralph, who kills Purdy in self-defense. Ralph is arrested and confesses to the murder of Colbert. He had attempted to rob Colbert to gain money to pay for Delores' abortion but accidentally killed him. His job done, Tibbs finally boards the Gulf, Mobile, & Ohio train out of town, seen off by a more respectful Gillespie.
不紧张,不刺激,但很从容,很大气,每一处细节每一个场景都充满戏剧张力,吸引你看下去,吸引你看下去的是电影中最基本的:剧情、演技。无需浮夸的商业元素,只要给我矛盾冲突和精湛的演技,就能成就一部佳片。http://movie.douban.com/review/4562495/
彻底的黑白交锋。社会电影。。
情节与表演都富有张力,巧妙地将种族问题融入到一起谋杀案当中,Rod Steiger饰演的白人警长态度的转变流畅自然并且这种转变也没脱离开角色自身的性格。开头一段的氛围营造就很棒,尤其是当影片结束再回看这一段时。
68年的最佳影片,奥斯卡真心喜欢种族题材的电影,中间黑人在摘棉花的镜头让人想起今年的最佳影片为奴十二年,就影片的完成度,演员的表现,种族主义内涵几点相比较,奥斯卡在退步
In.the.Heat.of.the.Night.1967.40TH.ANNiVERSARY.RE.iNTERNAL.DVDRiP.X264-KiSS
呵呵 好多的火车 风扇和钟 细节的用心可见一斑 摄影不错 表演不错 但太过舞台剧太过老派啦 话说那个耳光就叫名垂影史么
对种族歧视的描绘在那个时代一定是极为大胆的 现在看来也是尖锐的 不算严密的侦探戏仅仅是为了表达这个深刻的主题 横扫当年奥斯卡啊
除了黑人警察这一亮点在当年比较招眼,其他都没有什么兴趣。话说还拥有黑仆人的白人被黑警察打了之后还哭了,哈哈
想起了一件事,一个外乡人在北京的一个旅馆被人绑走,监禁,拷问,然后被扔在路边,抓他的人说了句:抓错人了。原因是此人和进京上访者住在一个旅馆
虽然说节奏略显沉闷,但是悬疑的成分是很不错的。很喜欢西德尼波蒂埃这位黑人演员。情节中加一点种族主义的思考是这个时期好莱坞影片的一个特点,还不错
角度新颖,表演不错,剧情不够给力.
其实我在这样一种设想。如果凶手是小镇里面的大多数人甚至所有人,动机设置成白人对黑人种族的歧视。会不会更有意思点?
第一个黑人奥斯卡影帝果然牛逼!但作为一个悬疑片剧情太单薄了,凶手暴露的太明显了~
1967, 又是1967, 挑戰那些無聊的種族主義, 洛史特加先生演出更勝一籌.....也開啟了雙雄模式, 最後的一笑盡在不言中.....鐘斯先生的配樂無敵.....
男1号够帅,故事平庸。“警察深夜里开着车巡逻看裸女”拍的有点意思,电影拿奖有点无厘头。
导演诺曼·杰威森要求罗德·斯泰格尔在表演的时候嚼着口香糖。罗德·斯泰格尔刚开始反对,但慢慢喜欢这个建议。在电影拍摄期间,他一共嚼掉263袋口香糖。由于当时政治条件上的原因,密西西比州最终从拍摄场地的名单中排除。伊利诺斯州的斯帕特被选为拍摄场地,故事中小镇的名字也改为了斯帕特,这样当地的标志就无需去改动。—— 在美国,即使南北战争、美国黑人运动过了这么多年,黑人依然存在被不平等对待的现象;即使同性恋婚姻合法,LGBTQ群体依然会被人歧视;……在中国,即使发生了重庆公交车坠江事故,依然无法杜绝全国各地接连又发生公车司机被打的事件……有时候以为这个世界会变得更美好,可是它总是通过各种大小事反馈给人们它一直都是不够美好。
其实是罪案片罩子下的种族题材。当然,案子的悬念设置得也不错。可是仔细考虑起来,最后得出结论也过于武断了。虽然早就暗示凶手是一出场打苍蝇的那个店员,看到最后还是觉得过于突兀了。映象深刻的是那一记打在白人脸上的耳光。同年竞争最佳影片的居然是《毕业生》和《邦尼和克莱德》……
1好警察和不那么好的警察的故事才出彩;中国对于警察题材如此忌惮以致于公安部还要审查,简直是在扼杀商业电影2获得7个提名拿了5个小金人,包括最佳电影最佳剪辑最佳改编剧本最佳男主角 3黑人影星Sidney Poitier出演,不过最佳男主角给了出演警长的Rod Steiger
《炎热的夜晚》就像一颗令人不禁摩挲的黑珍珠,浓郁、激烈又散发着夺目的光彩。电影不仅是为观众呈现了一个带有神秘气息的好看的侦探故事,更为美国的反种族歧视运动留下了珍贵的时代样本,电影与现实的完美结合将作品中本来非常强烈的政治倾向,化于可供观众品味的叙事之中。
1.警长的私生活非常值得琢磨,而且显然导演刻意有往那个方面引(家庭女性缺位,强化警长与下属以及非裔侦探的微妙关系),Rod的表演也完全把这种暧昧和隐秘感hold住了2.Ray Charles的Soul很赞3.小偷逃跑时的那一大段摄影很slay,诺曼杰威森的影像节奏感很牛